Jonathan Parke, former head of commissioning at RGT, now director of Sophoro Ltd.
The accountable Gambling Trust (RGT), the UK’s leading problem advocacy that is gambling, has found itself in the harsh glare of the media limelight again, this time for allegations of nepotism.
The charity, which is funded by the bookmaking industry to the tune of $5 million each year to research and promote the avoidance of problem gambling, has been under fire in the press that is british for apparent conflicts of great interest. Because of its ties that are close the gambling industry, concerns have been asked as to whether its research is completely independent of video gaming passions.
The RGT maintains that it is unbiased. But the revelation this week by the UK’s Independent newspaper that a firm owned by the husband regarding the charity’s Director of Commissioning 888 casino betting, Jane Rigbye, has been awarded a lucrative research contract, isn’t assisting the cause of credibility for the outfit.
According to your Independent, Sophoro Ltd. owned by Rigbye’s husband Jonathan Parke, was offered a research that is major as part of a £750,000 initiative into the aftereffect of online gaming on issue gambling.
Parke was once mind of commissioning at RGT himself, leading to accusations he and his wife swapped jobs, then quickly swapped contracts.
Sophoro ended up being granted the contract in December, the firstly two, but until last year the business had been registered during the couple’s house, and both Rigbye and Parke were detailed as company directors.
Moreover, Sophoro bid for the RGT contract simply two months after Rigbye stepped down as director to take on her role that is new at.
In response to the news headlines, Labour shadow gambling minister Clive Efford said RGT ‘should be disbanded’ if its research ended up being found to protect the ‘interests of the industry at the expense of people who have gambling problems.’
Goulden Steps Down
RGT has long been accused of being too sympathetic to the industry, and in particular for its refusal to denounce fixed-odds wagering terminals (FOBTs) in bookmaking shops.
Last thirty days, Neil Goulden, the trust’s president, stepped down following criticism by The Guardian newspaper that while chair of RGT, he had been also a chair associated with industry lobby group known as the Association of British Bookmakers (ABB). The jobs were held concurrently between 2012 and mid-2014.
Goulden told the Guardian that his participation with RGT, and the participation of the industry as whole, was integral to researching and ultimately understanding issue gambling.
‘[Bookmakers] will never have released data or have taken the actions it continues to ingest prevention of harm without my individual impact and urging,’ he said.
RGT, which will probably be examined by the charity regulator on the Sophoro event, told the Independent that Rigbye had no say in commissioning of research contracts.
DraftKings Appeals New York AG Lawsuit, Filing Says Empire State Should Ban Spelling Bees
New York AG Eric Schneiderman, who has been accused by DraftKings of earning mistakes in his lawsuit against DFS sites. (Image: pokerhomegames.com)
DraftKings has launched its appeal against the ny State preliminary injunction that seeks to ban day-to-day dream sports (DFS) and place an end to its operations in the Empire State.
The DFS operator’s 67-page filing pulls no punches, accusing ny Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of legal misapprehensions that ‘did not come close to carrying the burden’ of proof that DFS isn’t game of skill.
It further accuses the court of ‘abusing its discretion’ in siding with Schneiderman.
‘The court applied the wrong standard that is legal and ignored the undisputed proof, to find that daily fantasy sports contests are games of chance,’ the company argued in its filing.
Can be An Entry Fee A bet?
In December, Justice Manuel Mendez granted the AG’s injunction, ordering DraftKings and FanDuel to cease operations in New York State, its market that is second-biggest after.
DraftKings immediately filed a motion that is expedited stay the court’s decision pending the results of its appeal. It was upheld by a Court of Appeals judge that same afternoon, permitting the companies to continue business temporarily in ny until the case is resolved.
In his December ruling, Mendez had been required to see whether DFS was a game of skill or of chance, and more especially, whether setting a line-up was a skill-based process with an ‘entry charge,’ or an out-and-out ‘wager.’ He decided it was the latter.
‘New York State penal law does not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ instead it states that an individual, ‘risks something of value,” he said. ‘The re payment of an ‘entry fee’ because high as $10,600 on a single or more contests daily could be deemed risking certainly ‘something of value.’ ‘
Dog Shows and Bass Fishing
DraftKings’ appeal filing claims that if this were the truth, then ‘dog shows and spelling bees, yachting tournaments and bass fishing’ should really be ‘criminalized’ under Judge Mendez’s ruling. Each among these are events requiring entry fees whose result is prone to a feature of chance, argues the DraftKings filing.
‘Daily fantasy sports are skill-based games which are, and may be, legal,’ DraftKings’ attorney David Boies said in a declaration. ‘DraftKings competitions are no less legal than season-long dream sports, that the Attorney General has repeatedly conceded are legal.’
In January, Schneiderman amended their lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel to seek the return of all buy-ins paid by New York residents paid to both businesses throughout 2015, and also a $5,000 fine head that is per.
This would constitute hundreds of millions of dollars in buy-ins, plus around $3 billion in fines with 600,000 DFS customers in the state.
Outrage Over NFL-Owned Children Daily Fantasy Sports Site from Youth Advocacy Group
The NFL kids daily fantasy sports site is facing backlash from a few outraged groups, arguing the league really should not be marketing their product to children who are only six yrs . old. (Image: fantasy.nflrush.com)
Directed at pre-teen kids, daily fantasy recreations (DFS) site NFL Rush is being asked to cease operations by the non-profit company Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC).
The truth is that the National Football League is catering to children to participate in free DFS contests, with the chance of winning weekly prizes like an XBOX One, video games, and a grand prize of a $5,000 scholarship in a story that might seem more appropriate for satire.
Based on the NFL Rush Fantasy website, ‘US residents between 6 and 12 who have actually parental consent are eligible.’
Though the league and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, have long publicly opposed recreations betting and gambling, it evidently has no qualms when it comes to children and fantasy sports. The CCFC is calling on Goodell and the NFL to stop marketing fantasy football to children in conjunction with the National Council on Problem Gambling.
‘ There is evidence that playing fantasy sports, particularly with the incentive of valuable prizes as offered on the NFL Rush Fantasy app and website, can lead to problem gambling and addiction,’ CCFC Executive Director Josh Golin said in his letter towards the league. ‘It is unconscionable that the NFL encourages kiddies as young as six years of age to build up the habit of engaging in this adult task.’
The NFL has always maintained that any expansion of conventional activities betting could impact the league negatively and compromise the integrity of its games. Surprisingly, it’s taken a instead different stance on daily fantasy contests.
FanDuel has contracts with 15 NFL groups, while Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots owners Jerry Jones and Robert Kraft hold stakes in DraftKings.
DFS differs from sports gambling due to the actual fact that the participant isn’t merely picking a team or line, but assembling a roster of players in an activity that is considered to be an endeavor that is skill-based.
Multiple attorneys general have ruled that DFS constitutes gambling, with the operators themselves, not surprisingly, fighting right back. The statistics on whom routinely wins DFS contests seems to help the ability over luck debate.
But as it relates to children, teaching 6 to 12-year-olds how exactly to assemble a team of players to offer the very best odds of winning a video clip game console is undoubtedly cause for concern.
‘By providing these valuable incentives, the NFL is indoctrinating kids into engaging in dream activities by having a stake that is financial the results,’ the CCFC noted. ‘This exposes them, and our communities, to the potential risks of gambling dilemmas.’
You have got to Be Carefully Taught
It must be noted that the NFL hasn’t simply promoted a site that is online it’s offered an in-classroom curriculum for teachers since well. Launched in 2014, NFL Rush Fantasy Learn, Play, Score! was billed as a language and math arts program based around fantasy sports. The league says that this system wrapped by the end of 2014-2015 season, but in it, kids were encouraged to ‘choose their fantasy that is ultimate team week’ through critical thinking.
This program did employ basic math in determining exactly how many fantasy points are to be allocated based on the ball player’s performance, however it also required the student to understand the guidelines of football. Critics of the scheme argued it’s the NFL’s way to engage an audience that is new as youth football involvement continues to decline.
Hey, why not just teach the value of a buck with a ‘Let It Rain’ mathematics program since well?
No Safeguards for Guardians
If you’re thinking NFL Rush features a series of protections to prevent kiddies from enrolling on their own, you will be amazed to learn that registrants are merely required to provide their parent’s email address, therefore that the NFL can validate their age and guardian permission.
Surely no 10-year-old would think to enter their friend’s email or produce a yahoo that is quick to self-confirm their validation, right? Of course perhaps not.
From on the web poker to the emergence of daily fantasy sports, the primary concern for many legislators is how to protect adult consumers that are best while video gaming on the Internet, as well whilst the really issue of age verification. However, within the situation involving children, the most susceptible and impressionable demographic, small will be done to keep your child that is way-under-18-year-old from in daily fantasy recreations.
Surprisingly, no one through the contingent that is pro-RAWA to have jumped on this web site as evidence that kiddies won’t be exempt from gambling online. It’s precisely the type or sort of fodder that Sheldon Adelson and the bill’s other sponsors, like presidential GOP contender Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), want to throw in the face of everybody who supports Internet gaming.